Crosswashing in Sustainable Investing: Unveiling Strategic Practices Impacting ESG Scores

By Bertrand Kian Hassani, Yacoub Bahini

Rating

1474
Battle Count: 86

Relevance

7/10
The paper introduces a novel concept (crosswashing) and quantitative methodology that could significantly impact ESG scoring, which is increasingly important in quantitative trading strategies focused on sustainable investing.

Implementation Complexity

6/10
The MCDM methodology is relatively straightforward to implement, but gathering accurate data and assigning appropriate weights and levels requires significant domain expertise and potentially complex data collection processes.

Reproducibility

3/5
The methodology is well-described, but the weights assigned in the MCDM analysis are arbitrary and would need expert validation for full reproducibility.

About this paper

Methodology: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Problem types: Quantitative Analysis, Sustainability Assessment.

The interactive Everscope explorer (charts, battles, favorites) loads below.