Contingent Claim Valuation under Increasing Profit, Strong Arbitrage, and Arbitrage of the First Kind

By Yukihiro Tsuzuki

Rating

1681
Battle Count: 59

Relevance

5/10
The paper is primarily theoretical and foundational rather than directly applicable to trading strategies. However, it has important implications for quantitative finance: (1) It corrects published option pricing formulae for reflected geometric Brownian motion, which is relevant for pricing derivatives in markets with price floors/ceilings. (2) It provides a rigorous framework for pricing when standard no-arbitrage conditions fail, which is relevant for exotic derivatives and structured products. (3) The modeling of corporate stock issuance/repurchase effects on price processes is relevant for understanding market impact. The direct applicability to algorithmic trading is limited as the paper does not propose trading strategies or backtestable signals.

Implementation Complexity

9/10
The paper requires deep expertise in stochastic calculus, semimartingale theory, martingale deflators, and filtration enlargement. Implementing the pricing formula (3.1) would require: (1) computing the weak martingale deflator bL, (2) identifying the arbitrage times rho*, rho+, rho1, (3) solving PDEs for specific cases like reflected geometric Brownian motion, (4) handling the conditional expectation structure. The theoretical framework is highly abstract and not directly translatable to code without significant additional work. The examples (3.1-3.7, 4.1-4.8) provide some concrete formulas but still require advanced mathematical machinery.

Reproducibility

4/5
The paper is purely theoretical with complete mathematical proofs. All results are derived analytically from stated assumptions (Assumptions 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3). The proofs are self-contained and verifiable. No computational experiments or code are needed. The main theorem and propositions can be independently verified by checking the stochastic calculus arguments. However, the complexity of the proofs (especially Theorem 3.1 in Section 3.4) requires advanced knowledge of semimartingale theory.

About this paper

Methodology: Stochastic Calculus and No-Arbitrage Theory. Problem types: Optimization, Risk Management.

The interactive Everscope explorer (charts, battles, favorites) loads below.