Mixture-of-Experts for Cryptocurrency Order Execution: Training Stability, Tail Risk, and Failure Modes

By Alexander Ardaiz, Varun Budati, Ali Habibnia

Rating

1790
Battle Count: 51

Relevance

9/10
Highly relevant for practitioners implementing RL-based execution algorithms. It highlights critical pitfalls in training stability, the importance of repeated-seed evaluation, and the danger of attributing performance gains to architecture when they may stem from training specification artifacts.

Implementation Complexity

6/10
Moderate complexity. Requires implementing DDQL, K-Means clustering, and a custom LOB replay simulator. The core logic is standard, but the rigorous evaluation protocol (100 seeds, paired comparisons) adds computational overhead.

Reproducibility

4/5
The paper provides detailed pseudocode for the fill mechanics, specific hyperparameters (Table 1), and states that code and configurations will be released on publication. It explicitly discusses device-dependent reproducibility issues (CPU vs CUDA) and provides a device-matched baseline for decomposition.

About this paper

Methodology: Mixture of Experts with K-Means Routing. Problem types: Algorithmic Execution, Reinforcement Learning, Clustering.

The interactive Everscope explorer (charts, battles, favorites) loads below.