Portfolio Decarbonization under Incomplete Carbon and Transition Information

By Olivier Féron, Ruben Haalebos

Rating

1828
Battle Count: 50

Relevance

8/10
Highly relevant for quantitative portfolio managers implementing ESG or net-zero strategies. It provides a rigorous framework for handling incomplete climate data and optimizing for cumulative emissions targets, which is a growing requirement in institutional asset management.

Implementation Complexity

9/10
High complexity. Requires solving systems of backward ODEs (Riccati equations) coupled with Kalman-Bucy filters for latent states. Implementation involves continuous-time stochastic control and discrete Bayesian updates, requiring advanced numerical methods.

Reproducibility

3/5
The paper provides full mathematical derivations, parameter tables for numerical application, and describes the simulation methodology (Monte Carlo, Euler-Maruyama). However, no public code repository URL is explicitly provided in the text.

Abstract

We study dynamic portfolio decarbonization under incomplete information about firms' carbon intensities and the underlying transition state. The investor maximizes expected utility of terminal wealth net of a penalty on perceived cumulative financed emissions. Asset returns and carbon intensities depend on a stochastic transition factor, while the investor may need to infer the current transition state, its long-run mean and firms' carbon intensities from market observations and periodic noisy disclosures. The optimal strategy combines a Merton-type component with climate-dependent expected-return adjustments, a direct carbon intensity penalty and intertemporal hedging demands associated with stochastic carbon intensities and learning. In a numerical application, incomplete information has limited effects on welfare and target satisfaction when prior beliefs are well specified. By contrast, biased beliefs generate welfare losses in either direction but asymmetric environmental consequences: optimistic and pessimistic beliefs induce opposite portfolio tilts and therefore affect the probability of exceeding the cumulative emissions target differently.

The interactive Everscope explorer (charts, battles, favorites) loads below.