Amortized Neural Filtering for Calibrated Posteriors in Statistical Arbitrage

By Minkey Chang

Rating

1769
Battle Count: 50

Relevance

9/10
Highly relevant as it addresses a core problem in statistical arbitrage: the overconfidence of point estimates (winner's curse). It proposes a method to incorporate uncertainty into position sizing, which can improve risk-adjusted returns and reduce drawdowns, even if alpha generation is not significantly improved over state-of-the-art factor models.

Implementation Complexity

7/10
Requires implementing a neural posterior estimation framework, including a GRU encoder, MDN head, and a simulator for training data. It also involves complex statistical testing (two-sample tests) for model selection and conformal prediction layers for calibration.

Reproducibility

5/5
The paper provides a public GitHub repository (https://github.com/minkeymouse/nfe) containing the package, experiment scripts, and data pipeline. The data used (KRX stocks) is public, and the simulation parameters are fully specified.

Abstract

Statistical arbitrage trades on an estimate of the state of a residual spread, and conventional practice discards the uncertainty of that estimate. We keep the uncertainty and use it in the trading decision. A Neural Filter Estimator (NFE) is trained on simulated paths of a mean-reverting process whose innovation law is selected by testing candidates against real residuals; once trained, it returns the posterior over the latent state of every spread in a cross-section in one forward pass. Three results follow. On simulated paths with known truth, every practical estimator, ours included, falls in one narrow band of accuracy well below an estimator given full information, so the posterior gains no accuracy over a point estimate; its contribution is a correct account of its own uncertainty. On Korean equities, net of costs, the conventional point estimate forecasts about a thousand basis points per holding period more than it realizes, and the amortized methods cut that gap by a factor of roughly two to eight. Sizing positions from the posterior on the same learned factors as the end-to-end Attention Factor Model matches the Sharpe ratio of those factors under the base rule within the period's noise, at no more risk.

The interactive Everscope explorer (charts, battles, favorites) loads below.